下载App
资质规则
旅行
账户
tomtomtom19
Holiday Lets - One mile access path has access issue damaging car
Bull Point Lighthouse的点评
点评：I'm writing this for the Holiday Lets at Bull Point Lighthouse, owned by Trinity House and advertised via Rural Retreats.
While the cottage itself was lovely, I would recommend against booking to stay here. The private access lane is one mile long and badly overgrown with thorny branches along its entire length; even a small car was scratched on both sides, often squeezing through gaps of just a few feet. My holiday was affected too, as I limited trips to avoid further damage.
When raised, Trinity House seemed to believe the National Trust should cut the lane, which is why they had not arranged it this year. They stated that "the lane is not theirs and they have no responsibility to make alterations to it or control its condition," and were waiting on the National Trust despite hiring someone to do it last year. They even cheekily added that "there are numerous narrow country roads across the UK... with the risk of damage more generally to vehicles ever present... motorists insure themselves against that risk." They offered a nominal goodwill sum with "no liability being accepted in any way," and though they promised a gardener after my stay, their attitude suggests it will happen again.
I do not find this reasonable. As the party with the right of way, Trinity House has the practical responsibility to ensure guests can safely reach the property. I feel like they have misunderstood the difference between land owners and right of way. The National Trust's role as landowners for the right of way is simply to _allow_ access; maintaining the lane is Trinity House's obligation. Their correspondence shows they knew the overgrowth was recurring, yet chose to wait to see if the National Trust did anything rather than ensure the road was passable. A holiday property is only as good as its access, and until Trinity House accepts this responsibility, I would advise looking elsewhere.
While the cottage itself was lovely, I would recommend against booking to stay here. The private access lane is one mile long and badly overgrown with thorny branches along its entire length; even a small car was scratched on both sides, often squeezing through gaps of just a few feet. My holiday was affected too, as I limited trips to avoid further damage.
When raised, Trinity House seemed to believe the National Trust should cut the lane, which is why they had not arranged it this year. They stated that "the lane is not theirs and they have no responsibility to make alterations to it or control its condition," and were waiting on the National Trust despite hiring someone to do it last year. They even cheekily added that "there are numerous narrow country roads across the UK... with the risk of damage more generally to vehicles ever present... motorists insure themselves against that risk." They offered a nominal goodwill sum with "no liability being accepted in any way," and though they promised a gardener after my stay, their attitude suggests it will happen again.
I do not find this reasonable. As the party with the right of way, Trinity House has the practical responsibility to ensure guests can safely reach the property. I feel like they have misunderstood the difference between land owners and right of way. The National Trust's role as landowners for the right of way is simply to _allow_ access; maintaining the lane is Trinity House's obligation. Their correspondence shows they knew the overgrowth was recurring, yet chose to wait to see if the National Trust did anything rather than ensure the road was passable. A holiday property is only as good as its access, and until Trinity House accepts this responsibility, I would advise looking elsewhere.
翻译：我写此文是为了介绍由三一大厦管理、并通过Rural Retreats平台进行推广的布尔角灯塔度假屋。
虽然小屋本身很不错，但我并不建议大家预订入住。通往小屋的私人通道长达一英里，沿途杂草丛生且满是带刺的树枝；就连小型汽车的两侧也都被刮伤，因为车辆不得不从仅几英尺宽的空隙中挤过去。我的假期也因此受到影响——为了避免车辆进一步受损，我不得不减少了外出次数。
当我向相关方面反映此问题时……三一屋似乎认为国家信托基金会应当负责修缮那条小路，正因如此他们今年才没有安排相关工作。他们表示：“那条小路并不归我们所有，我们没有义务对其进行修缮或控制其状况。”尽管去年已聘请专人来处理此事，他们仍在等待国家信托基金会的行动。他们甚至还厚颜无耻地补充道：“英国各地有无数条狭窄的乡间小路……车辆受损的风险始终存在……”“驾车者会为自己投保以防范这种风险。”他们只提供了微薄的补偿金，并声明“绝不承担任何责任”。虽然他们承诺在我离开后会派人来修剪花园，但他们的态度表明类似情况很可能还会再次发生。
我认为这样做不合理。作为拥有通行权的一方，Trinity House有责任确保客人能够安全抵达住所。我觉得他们误解了土地所有者与拥有通行权者之间的区别。作为道路通行权的拥有者，国家信托基金的职责仅仅是“允许”人们通行；而维护道路的责任则在于特里尼蒂之家。从双方的通信记录来看，他们明知道路杂草丛生的问题反复出现，却选择坐等国家信托基金采取行动，而不是确保道路能够通行。一处度假屋的价值在很大程度上取决于其可达性，在特里尼蒂之家承担起这一责任之前，我建议各位另寻他处。
虽然小屋本身很不错，但我并不建议大家预订入住。通往小屋的私人通道长达一英里，沿途杂草丛生且满是带刺的树枝；就连小型汽车的两侧也都被刮伤，因为车辆不得不从仅几英尺宽的空隙中挤过去。我的假期也因此受到影响——为了避免车辆进一步受损，我不得不减少了外出次数。
当我向相关方面反映此问题时……三一屋似乎认为国家信托基金会应当负责修缮那条小路，正因如此他们今年才没有安排相关工作。他们表示：“那条小路并不归我们所有，我们没有义务对其进行修缮或控制其状况。”尽管去年已聘请专人来处理此事，他们仍在等待国家信托基金会的行动。他们甚至还厚颜无耻地补充道：“英国各地有无数条狭窄的乡间小路……车辆受损的风险始终存在……”“驾车者会为自己投保以防范这种风险。”他们只提供了微薄的补偿金，并声明“绝不承担任何责任”。虽然他们承诺在我离开后会派人来修剪花园，但他们的态度表明类似情况很可能还会再次发生。
我认为这样做不合理。作为拥有通行权的一方，Trinity House有责任确保客人能够安全抵达住所。我觉得他们误解了土地所有者与拥有通行权者之间的区别。作为道路通行权的拥有者，国家信托基金的职责仅仅是“允许”人们通行；而维护道路的责任则在于特里尼蒂之家。从双方的通信记录来看，他们明知道路杂草丛生的问题反复出现，却选择坐等国家信托基金采取行动，而不是确保道路能够通行。一处度假屋的价值在很大程度上取决于其可达性，在特里尼蒂之家承担起这一责任之前，我建议各位另寻他处。
© 2026 Tripadvisor 版权所有。
部分照片由 VFM Leonardo 提供。
TripAdvisor公司对外部网站的内容一概不负责。优惠价格中不含税和其他费用。
ICP证：沪B2-20200433
沪ICP备20013175号
沪公网安备31010502005427号鹰程信息技术（上海）有限公司
