下载App
资质规则
旅行
账户
Europelover2014
Not as good as expected
National Museum of the Pacific War的点评
点评：I hate to criticize - the museum is comprehensive and worthwhile. We spent over 6 hours at the 3 venues.
However, I was disappointed that there were few aural histories and personal experiences such as in other military museums we've visited. I thought that the various artifacts were not displayed in ways to help visitors build an understanding of the WWII Pacific war. To fully learn from the exhibits, a visitor must be prepared to read numerous signboards and follow battle sequences that are available as "interactive" exhibits. "interactive" is probably a mis-label - simply hit one button and follow the visuals. I felt the same information could have been gleaned from a textbook.
I'm quite familiar with the Pacific campaigns and had greatly looked forward to this long planned visit. Sad to relate that the museum failed to provide me with any greater understanding, anecdotes, or even trivia. Based on my experience, I would say this is a good place to start learning - if one is prepared to do a lot of reading.
It is perhaps unfair to compare, but even taking into consideration the limited scope of the Museum of the Pacific War, its presentations rank far below sites such as the New Orleans National WWII Museum, Canberra's Australian War Memorial, and London's Imperial War Museum. I would even compare it unfavorably with specialized WWII presentations and museums such as in Dayton's Air Force Museum and Patriots Point Naval & Maritime Museum in Charleston, SC.
However, I was disappointed that there were few aural histories and personal experiences such as in other military museums we've visited. I thought that the various artifacts were not displayed in ways to help visitors build an understanding of the WWII Pacific war. To fully learn from the exhibits, a visitor must be prepared to read numerous signboards and follow battle sequences that are available as "interactive" exhibits. "interactive" is probably a mis-label - simply hit one button and follow the visuals. I felt the same information could have been gleaned from a textbook.
I'm quite familiar with the Pacific campaigns and had greatly looked forward to this long planned visit. Sad to relate that the museum failed to provide me with any greater understanding, anecdotes, or even trivia. Based on my experience, I would say this is a good place to start learning - if one is prepared to do a lot of reading.
It is perhaps unfair to compare, but even taking into consideration the limited scope of the Museum of the Pacific War, its presentations rank far below sites such as the New Orleans National WWII Museum, Canberra's Australian War Memorial, and London's Imperial War Museum. I would even compare it unfavorably with specialized WWII presentations and museums such as in Dayton's Air Force Museum and Patriots Point Naval & Maritime Museum in Charleston, SC.
翻译：我不想批评——这家博物馆内容丰富，值得一看。我们在三个展馆里待了六个多小时。
然而，令我失望的是，这里不像我们参观过的其他军事博物馆那样，有很多口述历史和个人经历。我觉得各种展品的展示方式不利于参观者理解二战太平洋战争。要想充分了解展品，参观者必须做好准备，阅读大量的标牌，并观看所谓的“互动”展览中的战斗场景。“互动”这个词可能名不副实——只需按下一个按钮，然后跟着画面走就行了。我觉得同样的信息从教科书中也能找到。
我对太平洋战争相当熟悉，也一直很期待这次计划已久的参观。遗憾的是，博物馆并没有让我对这段历史有更深入的了解，也没有提供任何轶事或趣闻。根据我的经验，我认为这里或许是一个不错的入门学习场所——前提是你要做好阅读大量资料的准备。
或许这样比较并不公平，但即便考虑到太平洋战争博物馆规模有限，它的展览水平也远逊于新奥尔良国家二战博物馆、堪培拉澳大利亚战争纪念馆和伦敦帝国战争博物馆等场所。我甚至认为它不如代顿空军博物馆和南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿爱国者角海军海事博物馆等专门展示二战历史的博物馆。
然而，令我失望的是，这里不像我们参观过的其他军事博物馆那样，有很多口述历史和个人经历。我觉得各种展品的展示方式不利于参观者理解二战太平洋战争。要想充分了解展品，参观者必须做好准备，阅读大量的标牌，并观看所谓的“互动”展览中的战斗场景。“互动”这个词可能名不副实——只需按下一个按钮，然后跟着画面走就行了。我觉得同样的信息从教科书中也能找到。
我对太平洋战争相当熟悉，也一直很期待这次计划已久的参观。遗憾的是，博物馆并没有让我对这段历史有更深入的了解，也没有提供任何轶事或趣闻。根据我的经验，我认为这里或许是一个不错的入门学习场所——前提是你要做好阅读大量资料的准备。
或许这样比较并不公平，但即便考虑到太平洋战争博物馆规模有限，它的展览水平也远逊于新奥尔良国家二战博物馆、堪培拉澳大利亚战争纪念馆和伦敦帝国战争博物馆等场所。我甚至认为它不如代顿空军博物馆和南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿爱国者角海军海事博物馆等专门展示二战历史的博物馆。
© 2026 Tripadvisor 版权所有。
部分照片由 VFM Leonardo 提供。
TripAdvisor公司对外部网站的内容一概不负责。优惠价格中不含税和其他费用。
ICP证：沪B2-20200433
沪ICP备20013175号
沪公网安备31010502005427号鹰程信息技术（上海）有限公司
