点评:After attending two concerts, AC/DC in May and Metallic in June, I will not be back. The staff at RJS are on a power trip like nothing I have ever seen. For AC/DC my seats were in the 100's ADA. The top of the 100's with a lot of room behind us. I like to stand directly behind my seat and lean against the back rest. NOT at RJS! I was told to sit down so that I would not block the people in the SRO area behind me. When I attempted to confirm the reasoning, I was advised it was a fire hazard. Then for Metallica, I had top row in section 238 (East Club). Seats backed up to a wall, or concrete pillar, with a small area behind the seat. Standing there did not block anyone from moving around, as they could not go anywhere due to the solid concrete column. Yet again I was told that I could not stand there and was threatened with security. (NOTE: THE SHOW HAD NOT BEGUN) Upon making contact with someone inside trying to sell club seats, I was told "Rules are rules!" To those who attend events at RJS, rules are good so long as people understand why they exist. The 100,000 fans in attendance for Metallica in a stadium designed for 68,000, was not a hazard, but standing behind a seat will get you ejected.
翻译:参加了五月份的 AC/DC 和六月份的 Metallic 两场演唱会后,我不会再来了。RJS 的员工们正沉浸在我从未见过的权力之中。看 AC/DC 的演出时,我的座位在 ADA 100 层。100 层的最上面,我们身后有很多空间。我喜欢站在座位正后方,靠着靠背。但在 RJS 却不是这样!他们告诉我要坐下来,这样就不会挡住我身后 SRO 区域的人。当我试图证实这一理由时,我被告知这是火灾隐患。然后看 Metallica 的演出时,我的座位在 238 区(东俱乐部)的上排。座位背靠着一堵墙或混凝土柱,座位后面只有一小块区域。站在那里并没有妨碍任何人走动,因为坚固的混凝土柱子让他们哪儿也去不了。然而,我再次被告知不能站在那里,并受到了保安的威胁。 (注:演出还没开始)我联系到里面一个想卖座位的人,对方却说:“规矩就是规矩!”对那些参加RJS活动的人来说,只要大家明白规矩的存在,规矩就是好的。Metallica的演出场地设计容量是6.8万人,但现场却有10万粉丝,这还不算什么危险,但如果站在座位后面,就得被赶出去。