点评:We visited Explorium yesterday for a birthday party, and unfortunately, what should have been a fun and inclusive experience for my daughter left me quite disappointed.
I completely understand that safety requirements have to be respected. My daughter weighs 22 kg, while the minimum required weight for one of the activities was 25 kg. I accept that I should have checked the weight requirement beforehand, and I take responsibility for that. However, I believe there is also a responsibility on the venue to consider what happens to children who, for safety reasons, cannot participate in a particular activity.
In this case, the children who could not go on the activity were left sitting on a bench, separated from the others, with the option of using VR. My daughter did not want to use VR, and there did not appear to be another meaningful alternative. As a parent, it was very difficult to see several children sitting there feeling as though they had done something wrong or were being left out of the birthday experience.
I tried to explain this to the staff and asked if there could be another option that would allow my daughter to remain with her friends and still feel included. Unfortunately, rather than looking for a solution, the response focused mainly on explaining the rules and placing the responsibility on the parents. While parents certainly have a responsibility to check the requirements, I don't believe that should mean that the child is ultimately the one who experiences the consequences by being excluded.
My daughter should have been able to share the experience with her friends, even if she could not participate in the specific activity. I believe Explorium could make a meaningful difference by creating a nearby alternative area or adapted activity for children who cannot participate in certain attractions because of safety restrictions. The alternative does not have to be identical; it simply needs to provide a comparable sense of participation, fun and inclusion.
Most importantly, children should not be made to feel that they have done something wrong because they don't meet a safety requirement.
I am sharing this feedback because I genuinely hope Explorium will consider improving this aspect of the experience. Safety should always come first, but safety and inclusion do not have to be mutually exclusive. A better Plan B could make a huge difference for children and families in exactly this situation
Please don't just ask parents to check the requirements. Think about the child who doesn't meet them, and ask: “What experience are we giving this child instead?”
That is where I believe Explorium can do much better
翻译:昨天我们去Explorium参加女儿的生日派对,可惜的是,本应是一场有趣且能让所有人都能参与的活动,却让我大失所望。
我完全理解必须遵守各项安全要求。我女儿的体重为22公斤,而其中一项活动规定的最低体重标准为25公斤。我承认自己事先没有确认这一体重要求,对此我负有责任。然而……我认为主办方也有责任考虑那些出于安全原因无法参加某项活动的孩子们会怎样。
在这次活动中,无法参加活动的孩子们被安排坐在长椅上,与其他人隔开,他们可以选择体验虚拟现实技术。我的女儿不想使用虚拟现实设备,而似乎也没有其他有意义的活动可供选择。作为家长,看到几个孩子坐在那里,仿佛做错了什么事,或者觉得自己被排除在生日庆祝活动之外,真是让人心疼。
我试图向工作人员解释这种情况,并询问是否有其他办法能让我的女儿既能和朋友们待在一起,又能感受到自己是被接纳的。可惜,他们并未试图寻找解决方案,而是一味地解释规则,并将责任推给家长。虽然家长确实有责任确认各项要求,但我认为这绝不意味着最终要由孩子来承担被排除在外的后果。
我的女儿本应该能够和朋友们一起分享这段经历,即便她无法参与具体的活动。我认为,Explorium可以为那些因安全规定而无法参与某些项目的儿童,打造一个邻近的替代区域或适合的替代活动。这个替代方案未必需要与原项目完全相同,只要能带来类似的参与感、乐趣以及包容性即可。
最重要的是,不应让这些孩子因为不符合安全要求而觉得自己做错了什么。我分享这些反馈,是真心希望Explorium能考虑改进体验中的这一环节。安全固然至关重要,但安全与包容性并非互相排斥。一个更完善的备用方案,定能为处于类似情况中的儿童及家庭带来巨大帮助。
请切勿仅仅要求家长去核对各项要求。也请为那些不符合要求的孩子考虑一下吧。并且问一句:“那我们到底要给这个孩子什么样的体验呢?”
我认为,在这方面Explorium完全可以做得更好。