点评:As a paying customer of several children it is unfortunate that one of the children that accompanied my group was discriminated against because he is an autistic child. These indoor parks usually are for all families who are willing to pay and follow the rules. Tonight I realized this park is not for those who suffer from childhood autism. This child is not behavioral nor does he invade the space of other patrons. Per Fun City the condition for a parent to accompany a child who cannot jump alone is for the parent to purchase socks. After entering the park within 15minutes I realized that this child will not be able to enjoy this park. The father of this child was told he cannot jump when accompanying his son. We explained several times that he has not let go of his hand to enjoy the park himself and in fact he would prefer to sit down like the rest of the parents and let his child enjoy but unfortunately when his son enters a jumping cube he must as well to avoid his son from being injured or attempting to elope. After this the attendant then approached me who was with the group but not the parent of the child and started pointing to random children asking if they were my child and for me to provide proof that I paid for them. I asked to speak to his manager. I then explained to the manager she could look up my number and then explained to her what happened she then began and attempt to list that: we did not follow the rules (being that the adult jumped with the child) which was not safe and also that since we were a large group he had the right to check the bands of the childrenx I asked that usually the first intervention to a mistake is to educate so that the patrons can avoid making such mistakes. This manager was severely dismissive dispite us having a very calm conversation in the end she offered a refund and banned all families. I think that this could have been avoided if they had a sign in the window that stated “ no autistic children allowed”
翻译:作为几个孩子的付费客户,很不幸,陪同我们团队的其中一名孩子因为患有自闭症而受到歧视。这些室内公园通常面向所有愿意付费并遵守规则的家庭。今晚我意识到这个公园并不适合患有儿童自闭症的人。这个孩子没有行为问题,也没有侵犯其他顾客的空间。根据 Fun City 的规定,父母陪同无法独自跳跃的孩子的条件是父母购买袜子。进入公园 15 分钟后,我意识到这个孩子将无法享受这个公园。这个孩子的父亲被告知,陪同儿子时不能跳跃。我们多次解释说,他没有放开手自己享受公园,事实上,他更愿意像其他父母一样坐下来让孩子享受,但不幸的是,当他的儿子进入跳跃立方体时,他也必须这样做,以免儿子受伤或试图逃跑。之后,服务员走近我,我当时和这个团体在一起,但不是孩子的父母,他开始指着随机出现的孩子,问他们是不是我的孩子,并要求我提供我为他们付钱的证据。我要求和他的经理谈话。然后我向经理解释说,她可以查我的号码,然后向她解释了发生的事情,她开始试图列出:我们没有遵守规则(成人和孩子一起跳),这是不安全的,而且因为我们是一个大团体,所以他有权检查孩子们的带子。我问,通常对错误的第一次干预是教育,这样顾客就可以避免犯这样的错误。这位经理非常不屑一顾,尽管我们进行了一次非常平静的谈话,最后她还是提出退款,并禁止所有家庭进入。我认为,如果他们在窗户上贴上“禁止自闭症儿童进入”的标志,这种情况就可以避免