点评:Pretty disappointed with this venture. It has so much potential to be a really interesting, really important window on the settler past of Tasmania. The story of family fall out between Bickendon and the other arm of the Archers at Woolmers Estate is a fascinating one and worthy of thorough telling. As some time in the not to distant paste, the Bickendon Archers made the decision to open up the farm village, which included convict workers, to the public and at various stages, they have done some good things - signage and even scannable code which throw up videos on your phone. However, the thinking is being wasted by neglect. The buildings have been left and not maintained, even kept clean and well lit so that visitors can see inside buildings and understand what they are looking at. There is a difference between old and run down. In the one building where this has been done - the Dairy - the result is excellent but of all the remaining buildings, it’s really the only one worth entering. They need to have an external set of eyes come in and consult. By all means retain rustic - a point of difference with Woolmers - but present the buildings, inside and out, they way they were when they were used, not the way they were when they were abandoned.
翻译:对这次冒险非常失望。它有很大的潜力成为塔斯马尼亚殖民者过去的一个非常有趣、非常重要的窗口。 Bickendon 和 Woolmers Estate 的 Archers 的另一支队伍之间的家庭破裂的故事是一个引人入胜的故事,值得详尽讲述。在不久前的一段时间里,比肯登弓箭手决定向公众开放包括囚犯工人在内的农场,在不同阶段,他们做了一些好事——标牌,甚至是可扫描的代码在手机上播放视频。然而,思想被忽视浪费了。这些建筑物已被遗弃且未得到维护,甚至保持清洁和光线充足,以便游客可以看到建筑物内部并了解他们正在看的东西。旧的和破旧的是有区别的。在完成这项工作的一栋建筑中——Dairy——结果非常好,但在所有剩余的建筑中,它确实是唯一值得进入的建筑。他们需要有一组外部眼睛进来咨询。一定要保留乡村风格——这是与 Woolmers 的一个不同点——但要展示建筑物的内部和外部,它们是使用时的样子,而不是被遗弃时的样子。