下载App
旅行
账户
CramLondon
Disappointed
Greenway House的点评
点评：The longish walk from the car park through the reception, past the cafe and shops was great. When we stopped outside the house it was a different experience. It’s not an attractive house and pretty boring. With the wonderful gardens you’d think the NT would place plant pots either side of the door. Greeted by a nice lady who gave us ONE small information file which had tiny A5 sheets (about five in total) with a bit of info on each. I was shocked when we turned left into the lounge- it was dull, gloomy, shabby and cluttered. Moving through to the winter dining room/ kitchen- with plastic table cloths (a sign ‘do not touch’ touch what?) The dining room was the best room but Agatha’s dull dreary bedroom was awful, drab and cluttered. I asked if the NT had chosen the wall paint (an awful yellowy cream), but Agatha had. The house was like a dull museum. Gloomy and full of artefacts that didn’t interest. I knew about Agatha’s life and books (who doesn’t?) but this depressing house was a shock. There was no sense that Agatha lived there or wrote there. It needs a total refurbishment and some colour added (and some light! Agatha had the centre room lights removed and tatty I’ll fitting shades gave some light ). The furniture was drab and shabby and there was clutter everywhere. Surely not every artefact has to be on show, and why toys out in the lounge. Saying that, the kitchen the was pretty bare with a bread bin, china collection, and one sorry looking whisk hanging up. We couldn’t get into library as it was packed and a male NT staff member talking and keeping people there. I eventually popped my head in (another cluttered , drab room) but visitors had only less than a third to stand in as the rest was roped off. Come on NT smarten this house up- it doesn’t have to stay as Agatha’s family left it, furniture can be recovered and some of the artefacts stored. I thought it was an embarrassment to Agatha’s legacy.
翻译：从停车场穿过接待处，经过咖啡馆和商店，这段稍长的步行非常棒。当我们在房子外面停下时，又是一次不同的体验。这房子并不吸引人，而且相当无趣。从美丽的花园来看，你会认为 NT 会在门的两侧摆放花盆。一位友善的女士接待了我们，她给了我们一份小资料文件，里面有小小的 A5 纸（总共大约五张），每张纸上都有一些信息。当我们左转进入客厅时，我感到震惊——里面沉闷、阴沉、破旧、杂乱。穿过客厅来到冬季餐厅/厨房——铺着塑料桌布（一个“请勿触摸”的标志，触摸什么？）餐厅是最好的房间，但 Agatha 沉闷、单调、凌乱的卧室糟糕透了。我问 NT 是不是自己选的墙漆（一种难看的淡黄色乳白色），但 Agatha 自己选的。这房子就像一个沉闷的博物馆。阴沉，里面摆满了没意思的文物。我知道阿加莎的生活和书籍（谁不知道呢？），但这栋令人沮丧的房子还是让我震惊。完全看不出阿加莎曾在那里生活或写作。它需要彻底翻新，增添一些色彩（当然也需要一些灯光！阿加莎把中央房间的灯拆掉了，换了些破旧的灯罩来增加一些光线）。家具单调乏味，到处都是杂物。当然不是所有文物都要展示出来，玩具也应该摆在客厅里。厨房里空荡荡的，只有一个面包箱、一些瓷器和一个挂着的可怜兮兮的打蛋器。我们没能进入图书馆，因为里面挤满了人，还有一位 NT 的男工作人员在说话，让大家待在那里。我最终探了进去（另一个杂乱无章、单调乏味的房间），但只有不到三分之一的游客可以站着，因为其余的都被绳子隔开了。来吧，NT，把这房子装修得漂亮点——它不必保持阿加莎家人留下的样子，家具可以找回来，一些文物也可以保存下来。我以前觉得那样做会让阿加莎的遗产蒙羞。
© 2025 Tripadvisor 版权所有。
部分照片由 VFM Leonardo 提供。
TripAdvisor公司对外部网站的内容一概不负责。优惠价格中不含税和其他费用。
ICP证：沪B2-20200433
沪ICP备20013175号
沪公网安备31010502005427号鹰程信息技术（上海）有限公司
