旅行
账户
NaomiHouston
Great buildings and art, but oof - don't read the descriptions!
水晶桥美国艺术博物馆的点评
点评：Why only 2 stars? The interpretive placards in the galleries. It felt like half of the permanent exhibits were described with depressing statements on the ills of history, and little else. Opportunities to discuss the various schools of art, brushwork, the history of the sitter, the artist's contemporaries, materials used... generally overlooked to cram in another statement about the evils of the past. It felt like I wore a hairshirt going through many of the galleries. If you're hanging a John Singer Sargent and a Maxfield Parrish, mixed among other works with no signage, you're missing opportunities to educate viewers about the commodification of art, ties to advertising, and scandalous histories. And stating a still-life of bananas is nostalgic for a time that never was is just... odd. Obviously, I'm disappointed. The grounds are beautiful, the building is amazing, and there is excellent art throughout. To the curators - if you want to educate your guests, young and old, then do it - on a wide variety of topics that will engage and sometimes even elevate.
翻译：为什么只有 2 颗星？画廊里的解说牌。感觉一半的永久展品都用令人沮丧的陈述来描述历史弊病，仅此而已。讨论各种艺术流派、笔法、模特的历史、艺术家的同时代人、使用的材料的机会……通常被忽略，而是为了塞进另一句关于过去罪恶的陈述。感觉我穿着一件毛衣穿过许多画廊。如果你把约翰·辛格·萨金特和马克斯菲尔德·帕里什的作品挂在一起，混杂在其他没有标志的作品中，你就错过了教育观众了解艺术商品化、与广告的联系和丑闻历史的机会。说一幅香蕉静物画让人怀念一个从未有过的时代，这太奇怪了。显然，我很失望。场地很漂亮，建筑很棒，到处都是优秀的艺术品。对于策展人来说——如果你想要教育你的客人，无论年老还是年轻，那就去做吧——教育内容涉及各种各样的主题，这些主题可以吸引人，有时甚至可以提升人的修养。
© 2025 Tripadvisor 版权所有。
部分照片由 VFM Leonardo 提供。
TripAdvisor公司对外部网站的内容一概不负责。优惠价格中不含税和其他费用。
ICP证：沪B2-20200433
沪ICP备20013175号
沪公网安备31010502005427号鹰程信息技术（上海）有限公司
